Fake Nsca Personal Trainer Certification !!INSTALL!! Download
Download File >>> https://tlniurl.com/2t2MMJ
NSCA-Certified Personal Trainers (NSCA-CPT®) are health/fitness professionals who, using an individualized approach, assess, motivate, educate and train clients regarding their personal health and fitness needs. Certified personal trainers design safe and effective exercise programs, provide the guidance to help clients achieve their personal health/fitness goals, and respond appropriately in emergency situations. Recognizing their own area of expertise, a personal trainer will refer clients to other health care professionals when appropriate.
To submit an article to the Personal Training Quarterly, please refer to Personal Trainer Quarterly Author's Guidelines which are found on the Personal Training Quarterly page or email the NSCA Publicat -manage.nsca.com/education/journals/personal-training-quarterly/ions Department at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Every credential issued is blockchain registered. That means NSCA certificates are much harder to fake. Credentials are encoded with metadata showing who issued the certificate or badge, who it was issued to, and details about the certification, including when it will expire. Clicking the badge or certificate opens an online verification page showing whether or not the certification is real. This system makes sure those who have put in the time and effort to pass an NSCA exam are the only people gaining the benefit of an NSCA certification.
The Accredible platform includes a robust Help Center that covers additional FAQs to help you get the most out of your digital credentials. Visit the Recipient Help Center for more information. If you have any questions or concerns regarding our credentialing system, please email email@example.com.
Take this free practice test to see how prepared you are for a personal trainer certification exam. There are a number of organizations that provide a certifying credential for personal trainers. All of them require the passing of an exam to obtain certification.
So, to find out about certification, simply ask; actually, do more than just ask if the trainer has a particular certificate: ask for him/her to send you a copy. A simple photograph of the certificate would be enough.
Likely, the representative can answer the question or put you in touch with someone who does. At the very least, you can confirm whether the gym mandates current certification requirements for trainers.
A personal trainer could possess quite a bit of additional experience that makes him or her a good choice. Perhaps the trainer worked at the customer service desk of a fitness facility for three years.
Maybe he/she served as a volunteer martial arts instructor at a community center for a decade. Related fitness experience indicates a personal trainer understands how to work with a variety of customers in a multitude of environments.
Check out the references for the personal trainer. Find out if the work performed lives up to the credentials on the certificate. Asking previous clients how the personal trainer helped them out tells a lot.
The NSCA advances the profession by supporting strength and conditioning professionals devoted to helping others discover and maximize their strengths. We disseminate research-based knowledge and its practical application by offering industry-leading certifications, research journals, career development services, and continuing education opportunities. The NSCA community is composed of more than 45,000 members and certified professionals who further industry standards as researchers, educators, strength coaches, personal trainers, and other roles in related fields. fake NSCA license in America, buy fake CSCS certificate in U.S., order fake certificate in USA.
A total of 6175 personal trainer email addresses were collected from individual gym websites and forums. The survey and recruitment letter were distributed by finding any instructor email addresses or the gym email address on the individual gym websites and contacting through email. The recruitment letter was also posted on social media and on health and fitness forums with a link to the survey. The recruitment letter asked instructors or the gym to distribute the survey to all other personal trainers they knew. The survey was designed to be filled out only by individuals who identified themselves as personal trainers as specified in the recruitment letter.
The respondents were 54.5% female and 45.5% male. The average personal trainer age was 39.8±12.7 years. Personal trainers have been working for 13.4±10.0 years and work 32.4±16.3 hours per week. Personal training is the primary employment for 84.03% of the study participants (Table 1).
Kettlebells were used by 70.4% of personal trainers with 73.5% reporting one-on-one training to ensure proper form. The most common way for a personal trainer to learn how to use kettlebells was self-taught (40.5%) followed by a course (23.4%). I do not know how to use kettlebells was reported by 10.8% of personal trainers.
The use of odd-shaped objects as part of an exercise program was reported by 27.2% of personal trainers. Olympic weightlifting platforms or Olympic style weightlifting rubberized bumper mats were used by 30.5% of personal trainers. Olympic style weightlifting shoes are utilized by 9.3% of personal trainers. Barefoot lifting was allowed by 23.8% of personal trainers and toe shoes were allowed by 47.6% of personal trainers.
The typical exercise program for personal trainers responding to this survey was 33% dumbbells/barbells, 24% cardio, 12% machines, 12% resistance bands, 11% kettlebells, 7% Olympic weightlifting, and 22% other. Only 2.4% of personal trainers performed no stretching. The most common form of stretching was static (80.0%), then dynamic (75.6%), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (55.2%).
Olympic weightlifting (Table 4) in practice is different amongst the top four personal trainer certifications (ACE, ACSM, NASM, and NSCA). NSCA professionals (52.0%) performed more Olympic weightlifting than no certification (34.5%, P=0.035), ACE (13.5%, P=0.0001), ACSM (16.7%, P=0.0001), and NASM (30.8%, P=0.007). ACE (P=0.001) and ACSM (P=0.003) taught less Olympic weightlifting than no certification. NASM taught more Olympic weightlifting than ACE (P=0.047) and ACSM (P=0.01). There was no statistical difference between ACE and ACSM or NASM and having no certification.
Allowing clients to perform 1-RM clean and jerk/hang clean was increased amount NSCA (14.9%) professionals compared to ACE (P=0.02), ACSM (P=0.002), and NASM (P=0.02). No ACE professional (0%) reported allowing clients to 1-RM on this exercise, this was statistically lower than those with no certification (P=0.04). There were no statistical differences in between ACE, ACSM, and NASM. Allowing clients to perform 1-RM snatch revealed no statistically significant difference between the types of personal trainer certification. No certification had no statistically significant difference when compared to each of the types of personal trainer certification.
Barefoot lifting is allowed more by NSCA (35.4%) and NASM (37.1%) professionals than those from ACE (16.3%) and ACSM (18.6%). There was no statistically significant difference between no certification and any of the personal trainer certifications.
Toe shoe use showed no statistically significant difference between no certification and any of the four common personal trainer certifications. Toe shoes were allowed by more NASM (66.7%) than ACSM (42.9%, P=0.001) and NSCA (50.4%, P=0.049).
Personal trainers who had either a CSCS or a USA weightlifting certification had statistically significant differences in Olympic weightlifting, 1-RM snatch or clean and jerk/hang clean, odd-shaped objects, Olympic platform use, Olympic weightlifting shoe use, barefoot lifting, and allowing toe shoes compared to those without a strength and conditioning certification. CSCS professionals had a statistically significant difference in kettlebell use (76.4%) and one-on-one teaching (80.5%) compared to non-strength and conditioning certified individuals (P=0.04, P=0.014), but there was no statistically significant difference between CSCS and USA weightlifting certified individuals in kettlebell use or one-on-one teaching.
The personal trainers surveyed were experienced with 13.4±10.0 years of work experience. The number of years of experience suggests that personal trainers in the survey have been practicing through various waves of different popular exercise programs. Of personal trainers, 84.0% surveyed reported that their primary employment was exercise related. The survey also suggests that more personal trainers are female than male (54.5 vs. 45.5%).
Personal trainers with an NSCA personal trainer certification taught more Olympic weightlifting than uncertified personal trainers, ACE, ACSM, or NASM. NSCA personal training professionals also appear more comfortable with allowing 1-RM clean and jerk/hang cleans, but all personal trainers generally did not perform 1-RM on snatch. Uncertified personal trainers reported less one-on-one training with kettlebells at a statistically significant level compared to ACSM, NASM, and NSCA professionals, although uncertified professionals did report the lowest use of kettlebells.
Stretching is performed by the majority of personal trainers, with only 2.4% reporting not having participants do any stretching. Personal trainers most commonly performed static stretching (80.0%) or dynamic stretching (75.6%). The importance of stretching has been evaluated in the literature,18-21 but there is no general consensus on what the best stretching routine is to improve flexibility and performance. Based on the idea that only 2.4% of personal trainers did no stretching, personal trainers clearly feel that there is an importance in performing some type of stretching with clients.
The typical programming of a personal trainer is 33% dumbbell/barbell resistance training, 24% cardiovascular endurance exercises, 12% resistance bands, 12% exercise machines, 11% kettlebells, 7% Olympic weightlifting, and 22% other. This information shows that personal trainers use a variety of different techniques with clients and since we know that 29.6% of personal trainers do not use kettlebells and 72.4% of personal trainers teach no Olympic weightlifting, there must be a wide variety of different programs done in gyms and studios around the United States. There is not one best way to program exercise and therefore we expect there to be variability amongst personal trainers who have different backgrounds in exercise training. We are reporting that kettlebells are used more NASM and NSCA personal training certified professionals than uncertified personal trainers and that CSCS professionals also perform more kettlebell use than non-strength and conditioning certified individuals. Olympic weightlifting is more likely to be performed by NSCA personal trainers, CSCS professionals and those with a USA weightlifting certification. Our data shows the 3.1% of personal trainers surveyed who identified themselves specifically as personal trainers also had some advanced standardized training as a CrossFit® instructor. CrossFit® is a type of HIPT that has been shown to have improvements in VO2 Max and body composition,10 while showing to have a strong adherence rate.22 The only study to calculate an injury rate to date of CrossFit® participants calculated a rate of 3.1 injuries per 1000 hours,23 which is similar to the calculated injury rates of powerlifting (1 to 4.4 injuries per 1000 training hours,24,25 strongman athletes 5.5±6.5 training injuries per 1000 hours,13 dancing 1.5-4 per 1000 hours, rowing 3.67 per 1000 hours, Australian competitive calisthenics 1.1 per 1000 training hours and boxing 2 per 1000 hours.26-29 Injury rates in contact sports have been quoted as 20.7 per 1000 training hours or 6.9 per 1000 hours for pro rugby, 16 per 1000 hours of practice/competition for American football, 14.3/1000 hours handball games, and 17.1/1000 hours soccer.30-34 Bodybuilding has been found to have 0.24 injuries per 1000 training hours.35 The current literature suggests that HIPT is no more dangerous than other forms of weight training. 2b1af7f3a8